Safe Escape
OVERVIEW

Safe Escape is a secure platform for Operation Safe Escape (OSE), a nonprofit supporting survivors of domestic violence, stalking, and harassment. It replaces OSE’s email-and-spreadsheet workflow with a structured intake and case-management system designed for privacy, safety, and scale.

Safe Escape
OVERVIEW

Safe Escape is a secure platform for Operation Safe Escape (OSE), a nonprofit supporting survivors of domestic violence, stalking, and harassment. It replaces OSE’s email-and-spreadsheet workflow with a structured intake and case-management system designed for privacy, safety, and scale.

Safe Escape
OVERVIEW

Safe Escape is a secure platform for Operation Safe Escape (OSE), a nonprofit supporting survivors of domestic violence, stalking, and harassment. It replaces OSE’s email-and-spreadsheet workflow with a structured intake and case-management system designed for privacy, safety, and scale.

YEAR

Fall 2025

TOOLS

Figma

ROLE

Product Designer

CLIENT

OSE

The Problem

How might we streamline survivor intake and case management while maintaining the strictest safety and privacy controls?

In 2024, OSE assisted over 750 survivors. At that scale, relying on email threads and spreadsheets made intake and case management inefficient, fragmented, and difficult to maintain.

Design Considerations

Survivor Safety

  • Because survivors may be using the platform in unsafe or high-stress situations, privacy had to be treated as a core part of the experience. The intake flow needed to feel discreet, quick, and easy to exit, while also giving users more control over how follow-up communication happened.

Access and Organization

  • Because survivors may be using the platform in unsafe or high-stress situations, privacy had to be treated as a core part of the experience. The intake flow needed to feel discreet, quick, and easy to exit, while also giving users more control over how follow-up communication happened.

Access and Organization

  • Because survivors may be using the platform in unsafe or high-stress situations, privacy had to be treated as a core part of the experience. The intake flow needed to feel discreet, quick, and easy to exit, while also giving users more control over how follow-up communication happened.

Platform & Usability

  • Since survivors would most likely access the platform on their phones, the experience needed to be mobile-first, responsive, and easy to navigate on a small screen. It was also important to keep the intake process simple and manageable so users could complete it without feeling overwhelmed.

Primary Users

Survivor

Survivor

Needs a safe, private way to request support


Needs a safe, private way to request support


Pain Points

  • No structured, private way to request help; email was insufficient

  • Had no control over follow-up communication

  • Could not easily access resources or secure support



Pain Points

  • No structured, private way to request help; email was insufficient

  • Had no control over follow-up communication

  • Could not easily access resources or secure support



Needs

  • Complete a quick, discreet intake form to share situation details safely

  • Choose how OSE contacts them

  • Access safety resources without revealing identity


Needs

  • Complete a quick, discreet intake form to share situation details safely

  • Choose how OSE contacts them

  • Access safety resources without revealing identity


Admin

Admin

Needs a safe, private way to request support


Needs a safe, private way to request support


Pain Points

  • Cases were scattered across inboxes and spreadsheets

  • Logs were inconsistent and hard to rely on

  • Volunteer assignment and case handoff were unclear


Pain Points

  • Cases were scattered across inboxes and spreadsheets

  • Logs were inconsistent and hard to rely on

  • Volunteer assignment and case handoff were unclear


Needs

  • Review and filter incoming cases efficiently

  • Assign volunteers and track case progress

  • Maintain accurate records and exports


Needs

  • Review and filter incoming cases efficiently

  • Assign volunteers and track case progress

  • Maintain accurate records and exports


Volunteer

Volunteer

Supports assigned cases with limited, focused access


Supports assigned cases with limited, focused access


Pain Points

  • Had little visibility into assigned responsibilities

  • Communication happened outside a tracked system

  • Progress updates were hard to document consistently

Pain Points

  • Had little visibility into assigned responsibilities

  • Communication happened outside a tracked system

  • Progress updates were hard to document consistently

Needs

  • View only assigned cases

  • Communicate securely with survivors

  • Log progress notes clearly for admin review


Needs

  • View only assigned cases

  • Communicate securely with survivors

  • Log progress notes clearly for admin review


Goals

Design a secure, intuitive mobile-first experience for survivor intake and case management

Design a secure, intuitive mobile-first experience for survivor intake and case management

Create a centralized workflow for collecting, reviewing, organizing, and updating survivor information

Create a centralized workflow for collecting, reviewing, organizing, and updating survivor information

Support accurate automated logging and record-keeping for scale and compliance needs

Support accurate automated logging and record-keeping for scale and compliance needs

Improve coordination between survivors, admins, and volunteers while preserving strict privacy and safety controls

Improve coordination between survivors, admins, and volunteers while preserving strict privacy and safety controls

Design Considerations

Survivor Safety

  • Because survivors may be using the platform in unsafe or high-stress situations, privacy had to be treated as a core part of the experience. The intake flow needed to feel discreet, quick, and easy to exit, while also giving users more control over how follow-up communication happened.

Access and Organization

  • Because survivors may be using the platform in unsafe or high-stress situations, privacy had to be treated as a core part of the experience. The intake flow needed to feel discreet, quick, and easy to exit, while also giving users more control over how follow-up communication happened.

Platform & Usability

  • Since survivors would most likely access the platform on their phones, the experience needed to be mobile-first, responsive, and easy to navigate on a small screen. It was also important to keep the intake process simple and manageable so users could complete it without feeling overwhelmed.

Design System

Using the client’s existing brand colors and logos as a foundation, my partner product designer and I created the following design system.

Design System

Using the client’s existing brand colors and logos as a foundation, my partner product designer and I created the following design system.

Design Improvements

  • Form Builder

The form builder gave admins a flexible way to create and update questionnaires without hardcoding each field. Different question types could be added within sections, and questions could be reordered as needed, making the intake flow easier to organize and adapt over time.

  • Questionnaire

A structured questionnaire gave survivors a safer, more private way to request help without relying on email. The flow prioritized low-friction completion, guided inputs, and a built-in Safety Exit to support more discreet use.

  • Case Dashboard

The dashboard replaced scattered inbox and spreadsheet workflows with a shared overview of case status, priority, and type. By surfacing the most important information at a glance, it made active cases easier for admins and volunteers to scan, monitor, and coordinate in one place.

  • Case Card

The case details view brought survivor information, case metadata, and internal notes into a single record. This made it easier to review submissions in full context, update case information, document progress, and export records when needed.

  • Authentication

Permission-based authentication helped protect sensitive information across admins, volunteers, and survivors. Survivors could begin the intake process without creating an account upfront, while staff used authenticated views for ongoing coordination and survivor accounts were later created through a secure invitation link.

Reflection

This redesign project taught me the significant impact that thoughtful navigation and well-implemented features have on user experience! By exploring pain points and iterating through my designs, I've grown an appreciation for the subtle details that make interfaces more user-friendly. If time allowed, I would explore micro‑interactions (e.g., subtle hover states, animations) and conduct quantitative metrics (task completion time) to validate improvements further.

Design Solutions

To replace OSE’s fragmented email-and-spreadsheet workflow, we designed a structured system that supported both survivor-facing discretion and internal case coordination. The solution included a mobile intake flow for survivors, a flexible form builder for admins, centralized case management for staff and volunteers, and role-based authentication to protect sensitive information.

Reflection

Designing Safe Escape pushed me to think beyond usability alone and focus on safety, trust, and context. I had to design for people in stressful, high-stakes situations while also supporting the internal teams responsible for reviewing, documenting, and responding to cases. I had to really consider all different users of this platform and how my goal was to unite them.This project strengthened how I think about privacy-first product design and role-based systems.

If time allowed, I would explore user testing with the target audience (both survivors and OSE admins) to validate the effectiveness of the safety features and the usability of the case management tools, while also delving deeper into accessibility considerations.

  • Questionnaire

A structured questionnaire gave survivors a safer, more private way to request help without relying on email. The flow prioritized low-friction completion, guided inputs, and a built-in Safety Exit to support more discreet use.

  • Form Builder

The form builder gave admins a flexible way to create and update questionnaires without hardcoding each field. Different question types could be added within sections, and questions could be reordered as needed, making the intake flow easier to organize and adapt over time.

  • Case Dashboard

The dashboard replaced scattered inbox and spreadsheet workflows with a shared overview of case status, priority, and type. By surfacing the most important information at a glance, it made active cases easier for admins and volunteers to scan, monitor, and coordinate in one place.

  • Case Card

The case details view brought survivor information, case metadata, and internal notes into a single record. This made it easier to review submissions in full context, update case information, document progress, and export records when needed.

  • Authentication

Permission-based authentication helped protect sensitive information across admins, volunteers, and survivors. Survivors could begin the intake process without creating an account upfront, while staff used authenticated views for ongoing coordination and survivor accounts were later created through a secure invitation link.

Reflection

Designing Safe Escape pushed me to think beyond usability alone and focus on safety, trust, and context. I had to design for people in stressful, high-stakes situations while also supporting the internal teams responsible for reviewing, documenting, and responding to cases. I had to really consider all different users of this platform and how my goal was to unite them.This project strengthened how I think about privacy-first product design and role-based systems.

If time allowed, I would explore user testing with the target audience (both survivors and OSE admins) to validate the effectiveness of the safety features and the usability of the case management tools, while also delving deeper into accessibility considerations.

1. Inconsistent navigation patterns

Vertical scrolling mixes with horizontal tabs, breaking flow.

1. Inconsistent navigation patterns

Vertical scrolling mixes with horizontal tabs, breaking flow.